The recent release of 53 US Navy “Range Fouler Debrief Forms” by the US Department of Defense is a rather significant, if not earth-shattering development.

British Rail, the state-owned company that owned most of the country’s rail network and rolling stock, submitted a design for a flying saucer in the 1970s. Yes, you heard that right.

Congressional hearings into UAP will be heard by the House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation Subcommittee. This announcement caught many commentators by surprise with the prospect of further revelations regarding UAP. But what will actually transpire?

British pilots on exchange postings with the American forces were occasionally seeing and reporting UFOs as they flew missions over the United States. One such event took place on the early afternoon of 18th May 1954 over California.

An intriguing entry for 21st October 1952 in the Operational Record Book for the Central Flying School (CFS) at RAF Little Rissington, Gloucestershire, hints at a possible encounter with a UFO.

If you believe that the Pentagon will pull out all of the stops to prevent UAP information leaking, then AOIMSG sounds like a method of cutting the “Gillibrand Amendment” off at its knees, or is it simply another element of a much larger, more effective construct?

Just when everyone thought we were heading for another period in the doldrums in respect of official statements on UAP, along came the Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, with a lot more than a simple soundbite.

One of the mysteries connected with the Calvine case involves the Harrier jet or jets which were identified in the background of the images captured by one of the two alleged witnesses.

Look back over the eighty-year history of “modern” Ufology – from the Foo Fighters of World War 2 right up to the present day, and you’ll see incalculable examples of people jumping to conclusions on extremely limited information.

When it comes to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP), there are major differences in information, official statements and policy on either sides of the North Atlantic.

With the creation of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) at the end of 2020, led by the Department of the Navy for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (OUSD(I&S)), pronouncements on intelligence matters are now closely scrutinised by those keeping a close watch on how America is dealing with the UAP issue.

The Pentagon’s UAP report released on June 25th was recently discussed in the House of Lords. We give our thoughts on what transpired.

In advance of the much-anticipated feature on UAPs on CBS’s “60 Minutes” show, the CBS “Morning Show” ran a nine-minute long piece which included Leslie Kean, Avi Loeb and Seth Shostak.

Graeme Rendall gives a brief overview of the latest video of an unidentified sphere filmed from the U.S.S. Omaha and supplied courtesy of documentary film maker Jeremy Corbell

On 3rd May 2021, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General issued a Memorandum for Distribution entitled “Evaluation of the DoD’s Actions Regarding the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

The Pentagon released a further statement “confirming” Luis Elizondo had no assigned responsibilities for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). This official “confirmation”, was swiftly contradicted by Senator Reid’s rebuke in the form of a letter listing Luis Elizondo’s involvement and leadership role within AATIP.

With the anticipation surrounding the upcoming release of the UAP Task Force Report, we consider whether there should be a delay in publication?