ENGAGING MAINSTREAM MEDIA & POLITICIANS ON THE UAP SUBJECT RESPONSIBLY - part 1
Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) and the main reasons to disclose
WITHOUT DOUBT, WHEN we start to understand the true nature of UAP technology and the extreme radical abilities of what exactly is being reported by Navy Pilots, we must also comprehend the vast significance the issue has for the world and the Defense infrastructure. In recent years, and for whatever reason, there has been a surge in reported cases of UAP. The first ‘officially documented’ case comes from the U.S.S. Nimitz account in 2004 (however as you know, this was in no means the start of these incursions).
Reports stem back to World War Two and the introduction of nuclear technology. ‘Foo Fighters’ started to appear in our skies as small spherical objects that buzzed both the Allies and Axis Air Force powers. Almost as though somehow closely correlated to the increase of nuclear testing during the 1940s and 1950s onwards, the strangely shaped UAP or Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs as they were known), became almost commonly accepted over the western skies.
Both Allied and German pilots reported encountering strange balls of light in the skies during World War II.
Today, as a global community we still struggle to psychologically accept the reality of these UAP. Institutional stigma stops any rational conversation of this radical technology displayed by these highly advanced anomalous vehicles, the result, is that the issue goes unacknowledged. The reports have suggested the phenomenon has remained regardless, the technology beyond next generation.
Take for example, the report by radar operator Kevin Day, who stated that in the 2004 ‘tic-tac’ UAPs which were tracked on radar transcending from 28,000 ft to 50ft above the sea level in 0.78 seconds, or Cmdr. David Fravor’s testimony that the 40ft long tic-tac object was moving around like a ping-pong ball before transversing the horizon in a blink of an eye. Potentially, to be able to do these extreme manoeuvres through space/air/water, this UAP technology is using a form of physics we simply don’t understand, and certainly don’t have in the civilian world.
For me, this is the extremely main problematic issue. Given the reported veracity of such technology, the world’s scientific community has been unable to examine avenues of research once thought impossible. The lack of global academic and application research into UAP technology has also meant a lack of functional development in a multitude of areas we have yet to even consider. Such beneficial applications have consequently not been applied or considered for spaceflight propulsion. Today we herald Elon Musk’s Space-X as the most advanced form of rocket propulsion technology, however this is archaic in the face of UAP. If this issue and developmental technology has been classified within a Special Access defense contractor Program (SAP) for the United States government, it would arguably be a critical failure of intelligence for the executive branch as they fund billions into NASA’s chemical/rocket propulsion.
To do these extreme manoeuvres through space/air/water, this UAP technology is using a form of physics we simply don’t understand.
Additionally, we must look at the issue of Russia and China building their own Defense weapons based upon UAP technology. The compartmentalised format of both the United States and United Kingdom’s classified world has seemingly disallowed sensitive information sharing which has prevented leadership from being able to make executive decisions. And whoever is the first to develop these craft with hyper advanced propulsion abilities will dominate geo-political standings. Possibly even replacing the nuclear deterrent.
And finally, the third issue as to why UAP transparency is imperative, resides in the energy crisis and our climate change emergency. The hyper advanced technological capabilities of UAP coming through various reports, are indicative of an alternative form of energy being utilised by UAP. Some reports coming from contractor physicists have even suggested in the past that ‘zero-point’ energy is hypothetically being harnessed from the vacuum of the space around us. In addition to this, the hypothetical amount of energy used to manipulate and warp space-time to propel the UAP across vast distances wouldn’t possible using chemical propulsion, or therefore fossil fuels, which become redundant. Obviously, we must be careful as this is still a highly hypothetical point at this time, however, even if this has just a small chance at replacing fossil fuels it should be further investigated.
These are the practical examples as to why I personally believe we should strive to EndUAPSecrecy of unclassified UAP information within government. Obviously, the potential revelation that ‘others’ may be visiting Earth, or have been here all along, or that it is something completely unique that hasn’t even been considered yet is also important.
So with the reasons as to why the UAP issue should be pushed for disclosure, we started to look at how we might accomplish this in the civilian world.
The issue of Ufology
In late 2017 we came to the unfortunate conclusion that ‘Ufology’ would play no significant role in bringing mainstream credibility to the study and research of ‘UFOs’. The state of Ufology only served as a strong proponent of ensuring the issue was kept on the fringe and those looking to financially benefit themselves.
Ufology was not an established field of study, there was no peer reviewed research, no academic attainment or institutional acknowledgement, no degrees or diplomas and certainly nothing tangible beyond the unsubstantiated claims of cult-gurus whose philosophy was to sell ‘secrets’ to gullible people looking for answers in the wrong place.
As outsiders, myself and my first team (UAPinfo) came into the field of Ufology thanks to The New York Times article on AATIP. Upon experiencing the various subcultures, we were quite shocked by the working state of the ‘research’ community at large.
On December 16th, 2017, The New York Times featured an article regarding the hidden financing of the Pentagon’s ‘UFO’ investigation in the annual Defense Department budgets.
Unverifiable misinformation was matched only in credulity. Additionally, discernment was placed upon the belief that UAP equates to the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH), anything else was a plot by government to discredit their own self appointed narrative. Misinformation was accepted as fact, poor analytical methodology overseen by most of the beneficiary talking heads. And the most important point that we noted upon, ‘disclosure’ was something that was administered by a ‘dear leader’ figurehead who indoctrinated the ideology of learnt helplessness.
In short, we recognised that Ufology was not compatible with the mainstream world, it would be rejected outright in scope for research and activism. With this in mind, the two questions asked were whether worldwide Ufology had the numbers to make an impact within the mainstream and if Ufology could be adapted to be functional in the pursuit of pushing government transparency.
Discernment was placed upon the belief that ‘UAP’ equates to the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH), anything else was a plot by government to discredit their own self appointed narrative.
Trying to answer these questions was difficult. For example, to know exactly how many people in the world have knowledge of the UFO phenomenon was problematic. When looking at the followers from various social media accounts, subscribers, video views, likes and retweets across the multiple platforms of people such as Steven Greer, David Wilcock, Edge of Wonder, Ancient Aliens, GAIA, Coast 2 Coast AM, it would be estimated to be over 1 million people at the very least. The UFO media business has proved to be very profitable for a reason, and that reason is a high demand for knowledge.
So if the numbers are there, how can this equate to being functional?
Well, with this in mind we can consider also that Green Peace has 250,000 members in the United States and 2.8 million members worldwide. Extinction Rebellion (climate change activism) has much less numbers but still 650 groups across 45 countries. Worldwide numbers which aren’t too far from the interest in UAP. The difference is organisations such as Green Peace and Extinction Rebellion have active engagement. They aren’t subdued by the stigma of climate change activism in the same way that people in mainstream Ufology are.
This was a complex issue that would need to be addressed.
Applying change to Ufology
Six months following December 2017, myself, Keith and other members from UAPinfo decided that to have a credible conversation about UFOs, we needed to create a platform that would be accepted by the mainstream. We need to change how the conversation was addressed throughout Ufology, allowing for a change in how ‘UFO people’ thought and approached the topic, what they accepted as ‘fact’ and have them take responsibility for the image of UFOs.
Firstly, the terminology of applying Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) had already been established and applied via To The Stars Academy as an alternative to the stigmatised terminology of associated UFO concepts (hence the UAPinfo title of our early group). UFO to UAP was the first step, it allows for a reset on 70 years worth of stigmatised pushback ideology. It also allows for a reset on an unfortunate common mainstream misconception that the phenomenon is specifically extraterrestrial in origin. A major stigmatised hindrance to progression has been the use of ‘extraterrestrial’ to explain the UAP issue. My own experience in UAP activism has shown me that trying to argue that the phenomenon is ‘Alien’ or ‘extraterrestrial’ is also to setup the conversation to fail. Essentially, you are fighting an already established belief system that almost every person in the western world holds through a 70 year indoctrination period. Time and energy will be wasted trying to convince an individual of a conclusion which is premature at best.
On this basis, we agreed that labelling the origin of the phenomenon should be assigned to hypothetical speculation debate only, to not conclude on limited data, and to certainly refrain from approaching the mainstream with claims of knowing what the phenomenon really is. However, despite these adaptions being applied to social media platforms, we were still finding a dogmatic approach that reflected the old paradigm. We were accused of being government disinformation agents, the message was being lost, UAP was stigmatised and pushback had started from old guard Ufology people.
We found the indoctrination of Ufology was very deeply rooted from within a 70 years paradigm. We needed to explore other options.
