WHY NOW? RESPONSIBLY DISCLOSING SENSITIVE UAP INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC
The reality of Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) technology is slowly being absorbed within our Anglo-American community. The truth is that UAP represent something genuinely Anomalous, and by that I mean something genuinely unidentifiable by the truest sense of the concept. As I often say, ‘it may not be extraterrestrial, but it certainly is alien to us.’ Very few people actually consider that this phenomena might be something else entirely beyond an extreme revolutionary new type of black budget design. But they aren’t and as time progresses that will become apparent. Head of the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence (SSCI) Marco Rubio, has gone on record to state categorically that these UAP are unknown and are not American technology.
The anomalous phenomenon has arguably been around since the 1940s and the first nuclear explosions, and possibly even beyond that, if military reports from the time are to be understood correctly. Reports of strangely shaped anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) engaging pilots and servicemen span 70 plus years, most officially reported from within government programs such as Sign, Grudge and Bluebook (1947-1969) and then most recently with the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) (2007-2012) and the ongoing UAP Task Force (UAPTF) (2018 - ongoing)
What is certain, is that information is flowing into the public sphere like at no other point in the past 70 years. What started with the New York Times article in 2017 and the announcement of a real UAP program has snowballed into multiple military cases.
The U.S.S. Nimitz case was the first in 2004. The first confirmed case of a genuine anomalous aerial vehicle report was leaked via George Knapp in 2018. In the years 2014/15 we heard about almost daily incursions off the East coast of America that compiled the U.S.S. Roosevelt case report. This resulted in the famous Gimble video that stops and rotates to the amazement of navy pilots who recorded the gun camera footage.
The East and West coast of the United States saw incursions across 2019 as I discussed in an earlier article for UAPMedia. Off the coast of Virginia in March 2019 saw the ‘W-72’ case in which navy pilots encountered three separate objects within the space of 30 minutes – An ‘Acorn’, a ‘Translucent Sphere’ and a ‘Metalic Blimp’ all of which have yet to be officially addressed by the Pentagon, although have been confirmed as real by them (whatever they are).
Off the coast of San Diego, in July 2019, there was multiple reports of both drones and UAP engaging multiple nuclear strike groups. The photos and videos were confirmed by Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough to multiple news agencies.
Currently, we are still in the early stages of investigation for all of the 2019 incursions. We don’t know what the on record witness testimony is. We don’t know what the case report says, we don’t know the specific times and if there are other photos/videos and duration. The 2019 incursions need full transparency and further investigation rather than premature conclusions based on limited videos and photos.
We are hearing that the researcher who was one of the first to break the story, Dave Beatty, is finding more information that might give us a better picture as to the July, 2019 alleged drone incursions.
“What ships were involved in the July 2019 incident? USS Kidd, USS Paul Hamilton, USS Finn, USS Russel, USS Bunker Hill, USS Omaha, USS Raphael Peralta, USS Pickney, USS Gabrielle Giffords. USS Roos, and a bunch of others. Yes. Not 5. I’m up to 10+ These are facts’. #KIDDUFO”
Composite created by UAP Media of four images from a film taken on the USS Omaha on Monday, July 15th 2019 at 10:59pm (PST) in the Warning area off of San Diego that show an unknown object entering the ocean. ©JeremyCorbell/Extraordinarybeliefs.com
Additionally, apart from the date for the above video having been confirmed as 15th July 2019, we are awaiting more information on these UAP incursions from Jeremy Corbell/George Knapp (the people who broke the U.S.S. Omaha/ U.S.S. Russel UAS/UAP encounters).
The question that is often asked is, why now? If these things have been here since World War Two then why only now are we seeing pilots, intelligence officials and military personnel come forward?
Why only now are we seeing Senators and officials from the Department of Defense (DOD) speak up? Why are former Directors of the CIA and National Intelligence openly stating these are unknown vehicles? Why after all these years of the ridicule and dismissive reporting are the media now saying this a serious issue to national security? And why is the information being given to UAP investigators rather than the Washington Post and The New York Times as in the case of the first AATIP story?
Why now?
There are many hypothetical considerations. One is that China and Russia are developing hypersonic weapons, with some thinking they are based upon this form of UAP technology - and basically whoever works out the physics first has ultimate geo-political control. If China/Russia are taking UAP seriously whilst the West laughs it off then that is a seriously issue.
Another is that the prolonged use of fossil fuels is causing a dramatic change in Earths stratosphere and resulting in a devastating change in climate, the results of which will be catastrophic in under a century. Such UAP technology is reportedly and hypothetically not using fossil fuels but instead some form of ‘warp bubble’ propulsion that manipulates space-time.
And alarmingly, it is being suggested that there is a drastic increase within the frequency that these AAV are engaging nuclear strike groups. Another consideration is that the tracking ability of the U.S. military has increased to the point these objects can clearly be identified as unidentifiable.
Then there is the question of another nation being the first to produce clear ‘evidence’ of UAP before America and the West, which would cause untold issues of trust within government. Also, we must consider the benefits of implementing such a radical ‘5 observable’ technology within our own world, consider space travel applications, domestic travel, a different understanding of theoretical quantum physics and practical applications such as anti-gravity. How might we adapt and implement such technology within the public sector, the health sector, the Defense sector?
The list is endless.
So there are many reasons as to why these technologies must be pushed into the public sphere.
The problem became a question of how to push this sensitive data into the public sphere in a way which doesn’t disable the financial system, or significantly impact national security or essentially cause panic in the streets. This is done via a careful constructed ‘process’ rather than an ‘event’ form of disclosure. Information is leaked from a hole in a dam - rather than having the damn break and flood the townspeople. It might be a case of ensuring the right data is given to the right people at the right time and in the right way. This is to my understanding how it has worked so far.
Take the alledged ‘Pyramids’ which were leaked in an 18 second confirmed navy footage film. Should the object in question be a genuine UAP/AAV and should it indeed be pyramid shaped, well if so, it brings forward difficult questions. Mainly because we currently can’t verify either the shape or the testimony from what was reported by Knapp/Corbell in the short video alongside unverified anonymous sources. This could be as a result of accountability, people within the I.C. don’t want their name in the open for various reasons and so remain anonymous. But this doesn’t explain the format of the ‘leaks’. Such people couldn’t for example, remain anonymous and still leak a clear picture or photo of a triangle with documentation or a testimony attached. But that doesn’t happen and instead we follow a slow process by which data is absorbed by the ‘non-ufo world’, safely and responsibly.
The format of leaking Pentagon UAP information comes with a ready made stop-cap that one might argue, ensures control is maintained ahead of the UAPTF report in June. This allows pressure to build without exceeding the (potentially anomalous) conclusions of the upcoming UAPTF report and provides ‘awareness without focus’.
And through this carefully applied methodology, we can have the public understand the nature of the UAP reality without fearing it, and more importantly, have them support the recommendations by the UAP task force for further investigations via a fully established UAP program situated within the Department of Defense. I’m guessing the United States Space Force would be an ideal place to start.
But let’s wait and see what happens.
